Responsibilities of auditors

Responsibilities of auditors
Responsibilities of arbitrators :
1. Contributing to editorial decisions
The peer review process helps the editor and the editorial board in making editorial decisions and may also serve the author in improving the research
2. Speed
Any selected referee who feels that he is not qualified to review the research reported in the research or knows that his immediate review will be impossible should notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.
3. Company
The research should be treated as confidential documents after it is received for review. They should not be disclosed or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
4. Objectivity criteria
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should clearly express their opinions with supporting arguments.
5. Acknowledgement of sources
The arbitrators should identify cases when the relevant published works indicated in the paper were not cited in the references section. They should indicate whether observations or arguments from other publications are accompanied by the source in question. The arbitrators will notify the editor of any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under study and any other published paper with which they have personal knowledge.
6. Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Information or ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal benefit. Reviewers should not take into account research in which they have a conflict of interest arising from competitive, cooperative or other relationships or connections with any of the researchers, companies or institutions associated with the research